Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?

Serghiou, Stylianos and Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina G. and Boyack, Kevin W. and Riedel, Nico and Wallach, Joshua D. and Ioannidis, John P. A. and Bero, Lisa (2021) Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open? PLOS Biology, 19 (3). e3001107. ISSN 1545-7885

[thumbnail of journal.pbio.3001107.pdf] Text
journal.pbio.3001107.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Recent concerns about the reproducibility of science have led to several calls for more open and transparent research practices and for the monitoring of potential improvements over time. However, with tens of thousands of new biomedical articles published per week, manually mapping and monitoring changes in transparency is unrealistic. We present an open-source, automated approach to identify 5 indicators of transparency (data sharing, code sharing, conflicts of interest disclosures, funding disclosures, and protocol registration) and apply it across the entire open access biomedical literature of 2.75 million articles on PubMed Central (PMC). Our results indicate remarkable improvements in some (e.g., conflict of interest [COI] disclosures and funding disclosures), but not other (e.g., protocol registration and code sharing) areas of transparency over time, and map transparency across fields of science, countries, journals, and publishers. This work has enabled the creation of a large, integrated, and openly available database to expedite further efforts to monitor, understand, and promote transparency and reproducibility in science.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Oalibrary Press > Biological Science
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 11 Mar 2023 07:22
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2024 08:00
URI: http://asian.go4publish.com/id/eprint/797

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item