What is a “Good Life”: Protocol for a qualitative study to explore the viewpoint of older persons

Michel, Hervé and Prévôt-Huille, Hélène and Koster, Raphaël and Ecarnot, Fiona and Grange, Zoé and Sanchez, Stéphane and Mordaunt, Dylan A. (2021) What is a “Good Life”: Protocol for a qualitative study to explore the viewpoint of older persons. PLOS ONE, 16 (12). e0261741. ISSN 1932-6203

[thumbnail of journal.pone.0261741.pdf] Text
journal.pone.0261741.pdf - Published Version

Download (363kB)

Abstract

Introduction
Over the last fifteen years, Living Labs have been on the rise in Europe to bridge the gap between service providers, and the needs of end-users, and to speed up innovation, particularly in the field of healthcare and ageing. Ageing tends to be considered by institutions as a set of risks to be managed for older persons, illustrated in particular via the concepts of “ageing well” or “successful ageing”. In this context, this project aims to define the meaning and the conditions for a good life from the point of view of older persons themselves, thereby improving institutions’ recognition and support of older persons’ ways of living well, rather than imposing a general definition of “successful ageing” based on functional capacity.

Methods and analysis
This qualitative study is designed as an action research underpinned by a Living-Lab approach to co-creation. The aims are to: define the conditions for a good life as accurately as possible with older persons (Step 1); share these findings with different healthcare and service providers to adjust existing services or create new ones (Step 2); and disseminate them more broadly within the regions under study and across the scientific community (Step 3). During Step 1, the features of a “good life” will be analysed in a socio-anthropological study based on semi-directed interviews and observations made in the homes of 70 elderly people living in a wide range of accommodation types and regions. In accordance with French legislation, and as confirmed by our formal Ethics Committee, this study does not require approval. The dissemination stage is integrated into the design of this action research, and notably will provide for the appropriation of research findings by the partners of this study, by setting up creativity sessions (Step 2) and by sharing the general findings through panel discussions bringing together regional and national stakeholders (Step 3).

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Oalibrary Press > Social Sciences and Humanities
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 25 Nov 2022 04:58
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2024 03:44
URI: http://asian.go4publish.com/id/eprint/406

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item