Calibration of gas flow meters using choked flow and an evacuated vessel

Trueblood, Max B and Schmid, Otmar and Altese, Nicholas and Hurst, Christian J and Liu, Wenyan and Gelles, Teresa and Achterberg, Steven C and Whitefield, Philip D and Hagen, Donald E (2021) Calibration of gas flow meters using choked flow and an evacuated vessel. Measurement Science and Technology, 32 (10). p. 105105. ISSN 0957-0233

[thumbnail of Trueblood_2021_Meas._Sci._Technol._32_105105.pdf] Text
Trueblood_2021_Meas._Sci._Technol._32_105105.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB)

Abstract

The measurement of gas flow rates is of great importance in a wide range of modern technologies. This paper introduces a simple, yet accurate technique for in-house calibration of gas FMs (mass and volumetric) even under harsh environmental conditions such as encountered during field measurement campaigns. The method requires only readily available, low cost components: a vessel of known volume, an air pump, a pressure sensor and a metal plate orifice or a needle valve to act as a CO. The unique property of choked flow in the CO is used here for flow calibration. In the method presented here a vessel is evacuated to below the critical pressure (<0.53 of upstream pressure) and then allowed to refill with ambient air (or some other process gas) under so-called choked flow conditions through the CO. The method presented here leverages that the flow rate upstream of the CO is not only constant but readily determined from (a) the known VVESS, (b) the measured time rate of change of the absolute pressure in the vessel and (c) the ideal gas law. This calculated flow rate can be used for calibration of FMs. The accuracy of the method depends only on the accuracy of the pressure measurement, the timer and the value of the VVESS. The flow rate computed in this way is found to be in excellent agreement (typically 1% difference) with the flow rate measured by a soap film FM (Gilibrator). As expected from theory this method is found to work for all kinds of CFRs (here: various types of metal plate orifices and needle valves were tested), gas types (here: air, Argon, and CO2) and upstream pressures (here: between 650 hPa and 1400 hPa). The accuracy of this technique (∼1%) is as good as that of standard volume displacement methods (e.g. soap film FMs) (typically 1% difference), the standard of laboratory-based flow calibrators, but less expensive and more suitable for harsh environments.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Oalibrary Press > Computer Science
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 20 Jun 2023 07:17
Last Modified: 16 Oct 2023 03:48
URI: http://asian.go4publish.com/id/eprint/2368

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item