Mansfield, Megan and Bean, Jacob L. and Stevenson, Kevin B. and Komacek, Thaddeus D. and Bell, Taylor J. and Tan, Xianyu and Malik, Matej and Beatty, Thomas G. and Wong, Ian and Cowan, Nicolas B. and Dang, Lisa and Désert, Jean-Michel and Fortney, Jonathan J. and Gaudi, B. Scott and Keating, Dylan and Kempton, Eliza M.-R. and Kreidberg, Laura and Line, Michael R. and Parmentier, Vivien and Stassun, Keivan G. and Swain, Mark R. and Zellem, Robert T. (2020) Evidence for H2 Dissociation and Recombination Heat Transport in the Atmosphere of KELT-9b. The Astrophysical Journal, 888 (2). L15. ISSN 2041-8213
Mansfield_2020_ApJL_888_L15.pdf - Published Version
Download (752kB)
Abstract
Phase curve observations provide an opportunity to study the energy budgets of exoplanets by quantifying the amount of heat redistributed from their daysides to their nightsides. Theories of phase curves for hot Jupiters have focused on the balance between radiation and dynamics as the primary parameter controlling heat redistribution. However, recent phase curves have shown deviations from the trends that emerge from this theory, which has led to work on additional processes that may affect hot Jupiter energy budgets. One such process, molecular hydrogen dissociation and recombination, can enhance energy redistribution on ultra-hot Jupiters with temperatures above ∼2000 K. In order to study the impact of H2 dissociation on ultra-hot Jupiters, we present a phase curve of KELT-9b observed with the Spitzer Space Telescope at 4.5 μm. KELT-9b is the hottest known transiting planet, with a 4.5 μm dayside brightness temperature of ${4566}_{-136}^{+140}\,{\rm{K}}$ and a nightside temperature of ${2556}_{-97}^{+101}\,{\rm{K}}$. We observe a phase curve amplitude of 0.609 ± 0.020 and an offset of ${18.7}_{-2.3}^{+2.1}^\circ $. The observed amplitude is too small to be explained by a simple balance between radiation and advection. General circulation models (GCMs) and an energy balance model that include the effects of H2 dissociation and recombination provide a better match to the data. The GCMs, however, predict a maximum phase offset of 5°, which disagrees with our observations at >5σ confidence. This discrepancy may be due to magnetic effects in the planet's highly ionized atmosphere.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Oalibrary Press > Physics and Astronomy |
Depositing User: | Managing Editor |
Date Deposited: | 26 May 2023 09:51 |
Last Modified: | 12 Dec 2023 04:10 |
URI: | http://asian.go4publish.com/id/eprint/2169 |